Sunday, June 29, 2008

2001ut Tripod Quantaray

mass communication Quell NEW IDEAS

say that mass communication is a barrier to new ideas, seems at first a stupidaggine.Purtroppo this consideration is a reality.
imagine a newspaper (or a library) that will collect all the ideas formulated in a given time riferimento.Abbiamo already seen, talking about the problem of access, that any find a topic within a similar set would be virtually impossible .
There is only one way to make the material accessible to the reader of the ideas contained in a newspaper or a library: the mass of the material must be reduced. The editors or censors
will then make a selection, that selection will necessarily be bad, because in turn they will not be able to read such a mass of information to select alcune.Inoltre will be even more difficult to make a selection new ideas and unusual as it can not be established yet and the terminology that they require a certain period of riflessione.Editori responsible for the maintenance and censors material automatically meaner and already known, by rejecting new ideas.
We can see daily in our newspapers, on television screens, etc..
Now imagine another example - the opposite: that of involving an audience of newspapers between 2000 and 5000 individuals, newspapers, provincial, sectoral, etc.. They can never
disseminate new ideas in their entirety, but will certainly post all new features offered by one of their many readers, and those ideas become accessible to all altri.Ora, if we assume that each community between 5000 and 10000 shall have its own newspaper, we may take for certain that all new ideas are published, though not necessarily read by all the inhabitants of globo.Per how simple the procedure but not however, eludes the rejection of new ideas and possibly result in multiplication and diversification of sottociviltà.
With this imaginary example I wanted to illustrate how the generalized communication, as opposed to the idea that if they did not generally favor the development of the cultural or human knowledge, but is instead an instrument of impoverishment. THE
forms of communication 'VALID appears to remain face to face ones!

( FROM "Utopia establishing" Yona Friedman - EDITIONS Quodlibet)

0 comments:

Post a Comment