Who is to speak or use language to fashion today, those "languages" for "language" (neologism maturana today's post-Marxist (1) (sic), not 'apparently too much importance to the contents of thought it expresses.
The diminishing importance of this - mind you - about the habit how we behave with our fellow man, and not an issue here as usual, since everyone is free to have their own habits. A person who has, for example, the habit of talking in her dialect is mainly to criticize, especially when it relates to people who understand it, but how does it relate to people who do not know its own dialect, the problems begin.
To take another example: if you speak Italian in China will be quite rare understanding with the Chinese.
So if someone requests to a scholar in the philosophy of liberty of pointing out the dynamics of free thought, should give importance (at least) to the words with which he makes such a request. It seems to me something very complicated, because this is exactly what you do when, for example, you go to the market to buy cherries: if you buy a pound of cherries from the grocery store you can not expect the fruit including cherries, your going to have if instead you say "cherry" you say "banana."
Well, in this regard, I have to say something that is unbelievable.
A lady asked me time ago (August 2006) to give a lecture on a specific theme (free thought) for a group of fish [...]
to see the complete page source:
http:// digilander.libero.it / EpikeiaVostrAmata / parlare_per_parlare.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment